Media to longe for politics – GEZ
[fee collection center of public-law broadcasting institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany]
2017-03-30
Claus Plantiko, Avocat definitive, lay assessor, focussed critic of the separation of powers in Germany.
Bonn. The rationalist and movie maker Volker Hoffmann and Heiderose Manthey, Chairwoman of the ARCHE, educationalist and freelance journalist on their way to overcome kid – eke – pas child snatching (not only) in Germany – parental – child – alienation – parental alienation syndrome have met the Avocat definitive, lay assessor Claus Plantiko in Bonn for a discussion on the issue of constitutionality in Germany.
This complex interview shall be published in several sequences.
Citizens are holders of fundamental rights.
PLANTIKO: Freedom of speech and opinion is a fundamental right, which must, can and may be claimed of the government since the citizen is a holder of fundamental rights, and the government, respectively the federal states and the federal government are obliged to the constitution, and therefore must grant freedom of speech.
The movie
In written form: The Interview
Heiderose Manthey: Is main-stream media the perfect way to manipulate a nation and what is your opinion to the claims of the GEZ ?
Claus Plantiko: Certainly this is a serious violation of the constitution.
PLANTIKO: Freedom of speech and opinion is a fundamental right, which must, can and may be claimed of the government since the citizen is a holder of fundamental rights, and the government, respectively the federal states and the federal government are obliged to the constitution, and therefore must grant freedom of speech.
Public law of the federal states concerning the broadcasting fees are based, unfortunately with approval of the Federal Constitutional Court, on article 5 GG “Freedom of Speech”. They believe in the right to give the correct belief to the public. Article 5 of the constitution “Freedom of Speech/Opinion” means nothing but the right of defence of the individual against the state, against governmental influence. Freedom of speech is a fundamental right, which must, can and may be claimed of the government since the citizen is a holder of fundamental rights, and the government, respectively the federal states and the federal government are obliged to the constitution, and therefore must grant freedom of speech and opinion.
Perversion of the constitution
What we have is exactly the opposite: A perversion of the constitution in which the one who shall be granting the rights is turning law upside down, taking the position of the one entitled to these rights – illegally, unconstitutionally – and thereby forcing the citizen, the one who is entitled, into the correct opinion.
Perversion unlimited and everyone joins in !
Parliaments are established unconstitutionally
The Tillessen-decree implies that the complete law that has been established by German Parliaments since 1949 is invalid since the Parliaments have been assembled unconstitutionally. Members of Parliaments are not only the members elected but, unconstitutionally various groups of executive officers holding the right to vote, the Chancellor, Prime Minister, Vice-Chancellor, Parliamentary Secretaries and Ministers, all of them part of the executive authority and based on article 20,2 constitution, separation of powers of executive and legislative must act as separated bodies which means against each other, following interests which are directed against each other.
“A union of executive and legislative powers”, so Mr Montesquieu (1) “can only end up in injustice.”
Which state is worse than Germany ?
Talking about true despotism there are of course states like North Korea…, here are only few murdered by the state, means the ones which are murdered by secret services, so that the Germans do not act like this. Otherwise the situation concerning the lack of rights, not considering horrible consequences like death and mayhem are extremely bad in Germany…. In England, France, Spain and also the Scandinavian countries it is a better situation since they are more law-abiding and have a stronger bonding of the authority of the state to a sense of justice which means more certainty what is right and what is wrong.
(1) Montesquieu: „There is no liberty where you find executive and legislative authorities in one body“ – Vom Geist der Gesetze (De l’esprit des lois), XI, 6
(Original French.: „Lorsque dans la même personne ou dans le même corps de magistrature, la puissance législative est réunie à la puissance exécutrice, il n’y a point de liberté.“)
(2) Montesquieu: „Within despotism it is just as dangerous if someone thinks good or bad, just the fact of thinking is enough to alarm the leader of the government. Vom Geist der Gesetze (De l’esprit des lois), XIX, 27″
(Original French.: „Dans un gouvernement despotique, il est également pernicieux qu’on raisonne bien ou mal; il suffit qu’on raisonne pour que le principe du gouvernement soit choqué.“)
INFO: The up to the year 2012 established fee collection center of public-law broadcasting institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany has since January 1st 2013 a non-legally responsible community facility of nine public broadcasting corporations of the Federal Republic of Germany collecting broadcasting fees.
“In 2015 she collected more than 8.1 billion Euros of 44,661 million bank accounts.[6], 25,5 million reminders for payment and 720.000 enforcements.
Original text in German language
.
Another information
Claus Plantiko: Gibt es „RECHT“ in der SCHEIN-DEMOKRATIE Deutschland ?
Aus der Reihe „Deutschland – Demokratie – Recht. Ein Rechtsstaat auf dem Weg zur Diktatur“